Other Civil Rights Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 69
Morgan v. City of Utica We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2022cv01035
Plaintiff: Christopher Morgan
Defendant: City of Utica
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Williams et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2022cv00982
Plaintiff: Sheila Robinson
Defendant: Mark Williams, Kyle Piersall, John De Traglia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morgan v. City of Utica, New York We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2020cv01424
Defendant: City of Utica, New York
Plaintiff: Peter R. Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Davis v. City of Utica et al
as 6:2020cv01340
Defendant: Police Officer John P. Detraglia, Sergeant Goldstein, City of Utica and others
Plaintiff: Daniel E. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Weather v. Lisi et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2019cv01485
Plaintiff: Leonard Eugene Weather and Leonard E. Weather
Defendant: City of Utica, County of Oneida, Laurie Lisi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kuchma v. City of Utica, NY et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2019cv00766
Defendant: Police SGT Abel and City of Utica, NY
Plaintiff: George John Kuchma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pajazetovic v. The City of Utica, New York et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2018cv01496
Defendant: Eric White, Zachary Ciotti, Ashley Berger and others
Plaintiff: Hasica Pajazetovic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rose v. The City of Utica
as 18-1491
Plaintiff - Appellant: Christine Almas Rose, individually and as mother of Jessie Lee Rose
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant: Michael J. Rose, individually and as father of Jessie Lee Rose, and as the administrator of the estate of Jessie Lee Rose
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee: City of Utica and Officer Anthony Ellis, individually and as a police officer of the City of Utica
Defendant-Counter-Claimant: Utica Police Department
Jeanty v. City of Utica
as 17-2909
Plaintiff - Appellant: Vladimir Jeanty
Defendant - Appellee: Investigator Peter Paladino, badge #6290, individually and in his official capacity, Lieutenant Sean Dougherty, badge #2553, individually and in his official capacity, Mark Williams, Chief of Police, Utica Police Department; individually and in his official capacity and others
Defendant: John Doe, #1-6, individually and in their capacity and John Doe #7, Corporation Counsel, City of Utica, individually and in his official capacity
Torres v. Faxton-St. Luke's Healthcare
as 17-30
Plaintiff - Appellee: Ricco Ray Torres, Administrator of the Estate of Cindy M. Golden and as Parent and Natural Guardian of A.T., and infant under the age of 10 years and Joseph Bumbolo, Administrator of the Estate of Michele Bumbolo and Administrator of the Estate of Michael Bumbolo
Defendant: Faxton-St. Luke's Healthcare, AKA Mohawk Valley Health System, Lingappa S. Amernath, M.D., John Doe, M.D. (a fictional name more fully described herein) and others
Defendant - Appellant: James W. Graeff, Who during their employment, association, and/or affiliation with the City of Utica, New York, City of Utica Police Department and City of Utica Fire Department responded, arrested, investigate, took into custody appeared or otherwise par, Dzevad Bajrektarevic, Who during their employment, association, and/or affiliation with the City of Utica, New York, City of Utica Police Department and City of Utica Fire Department responded, arrested, investigate, took into custody appeared or otherwis, Brian Banser, Who during their employment, association, and/or affiliation with the City of Utica, New York, City of Utica Police Department and City of Utica Fire Department responded, arrested, investigate, took into custody appeared or otherwise partic and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?