Cases 11 - 20 of 49
Todd Zappone, et al v. USA, et al
as 16-4111
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TODD N. ZAPPONE, CARRIE M. ZAPPONE, DUSTIN A. ZAPPONE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RANDALL E. NEAL, RICHARD DAILY and others
Defendant:
RICHARD DAILY, et al
Filing Error
as 3:2015cv02126
Plaintiff:
Todd N Zappone , Carrie M Zappone , Dustin A Zappone and others
Defendant:
Randall E Neal, Robert Taulbee, Robert Leuenberger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Zappone et al v. Daily et al
as 3:2015cv02135
Plaintiff:
Todd N Zappone , Carrie M Zappone , Dustin A Zappone and others
Defendant:
Randall E Neal, Robert Taulbee, Robert Leuenberger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Comerica Bank v. Peggy e Martin et al
as 2:2015cv04215
Defendant:
Delray Bradley, Does and Peggy e Martin
Plaintiff:
Comerica Bank
Joseph Rowlery, Jr. v. Genesee County, et al
as 15-1567
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOSEPH ROWLERY, JR.
Defendant:
GENESEE COUNTY, DAVID SCHMIEDER, SZEMITES and others
Defendant - Appellant:
ROBERT WINSTON, E. MARTIN, S. PRITCHARD and others
Martin v. Buchanan et al
as 1:2014cv02812
Plaintiff:
Tremaine E. Martin
Defendant:
A Deane Buchanan and Tiffany A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kyle Hudson v. Ziebarth
as 3:2014cv00620
Defendant:
Martin Ziebarth , Roberto Ruiz, Jr and E. Martin
Plaintiff:
Kyle Hudson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Martin v. Cleve Hts Police Dept
as 1:2013cv01750
Plaintiff:
Tremaine E. Martin
Defendant:
Cleve Hts Police Dept
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chowdhury v. Henry Ford Health System et al
as 2:2013cv12984
Plaintiff:
Abdul M Chowdhury
Defendant:
Henry Ford Health System, Mike Smith, K Kalonich and others
Howard Martin v. Ohio, et al
as 13-3733
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOWARD E. MARTIN, III
Defendant - Appellee:
OHIO, JUDGE LISA C. ALLEN and HAMILTON COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
