Cases 11 - 20 of 57
Ching v. City of Minneapolis et al
as 0:2021cv02467
Plaintiff:
Florine K. Ching
Defendant:
City of Minneapolis, Ofc. Neal Walsh, Ofc. Ryan Keyes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Scheffler v. County of Crow Wing et al
as 0:2020cv02300
Defendant:
County of Crow Wing, Scott Goddard, Joseph Meyer and others
Plaintiff:
Troy K. Scheffler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scheffler v. City of Nisswa et al
as 0:2020cv02234
Defendant:
Craig Taylor, City of Nisswa, Conner Collette and others
Plaintiff:
Troy K. Scheffler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zajac v. Statton et al
as 0:2020cv02148
Defendant:
Maria K Statton, Cheryl L Bailey, Patricia J Lindholm and others
Plaintiff:
Dr. Robert John Zajac and Robert Zajac
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lanners et al v. State of Minnesota
as 0:2019cv02578
Plaintiff:
Weston Lanners, Cassandra Lanners and Cassandra K Lanners
Defendant:
State of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2019cv01864
Defendant:
K. Knutson, State of Minnesota, N. Pelosi and others
Plaintiff:
Howard G Jackson and Howard G. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scheffler v. Kaplan, Inc. et al
as 0:2018cv03310
Defendant:
Kaplan, Inc. and Richard H. Kyle, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Troy K. Scheffler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farmer v. Roy et al
as 0:2018cv02375
Defendant:
Rebecca Holmes, Chad Johnson, Nate Cole and others
Plaintiff:
Clifford M. Farmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Koski v. Jago et al
as 0:2018cv02085
Defendant:
St. Louis County PHHS, James Jago, Sara Janofski and others
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline K. Koski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scheffler v. City of Blaine et al
as 0:2018cv01757
Defendant:
City of Blaine and District Court Administrator of the Tenth Judicial District of the State of Minnesota
Plaintiff:
Troy K. Scheffler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
