Cases 191 - 200 of 7,770
Hawkins v. Caperter et al
as 1:2024cv01018
Plaintiff:
Leon Hawkins
Defendant:
Rod Caperter, Jr., Unknown Lyhoyd, Curry Brasfield and others
Price v. Memphis Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv02136
Plaintiff:
Brandon Price
Defendant:
Memphis Police Department and Police Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
as 3:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Phillips v. Coffee County, Tennessee et al
as 4:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Justin Phillips
Defendant:
Coffee County, Tennessee, Steven Austin Qualls, Blake Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #023 v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
John Doe #023
Defendant:
Governor William B Lee, Director David B. Rausch, William B Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Jones v. Citibank
as 2:2024cv02012
Plaintiff:
Gregory Jermaine Jones
Defendant:
Citibank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cooper v. Lee et al
as 1:2024cv00049
Plaintiff:
Monolito B. Cooper
Defendant:
Bill Lee, Jonathan Skrmetti and State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Boshers v. Maury County Board of Education, et al
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Don H. Boshers
Defendant:
Maury County Board of Education, Lisa A. Ventura and Chandler R. Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peace Love Lightning v. Officer 1 et al
as 2:2024cv02020
Plaintiff:
Peace Love Lightning
Defendant:
Officer 1, Worthy, Giannini and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe #018 v. Lee et al
as 2:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
John Doe #018
Defendant:
William Lee and David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
