Cases 21 - 30 of 37
Haney et al v. The Town of Mill Creek et al
as 2:2013cv00030
Plaintiff:
John Haney
Defendant:
The Town of Mill Creek, Eddie Currence, Allen Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McDowell v. Town of Sophia et al
as 5:2012cv01340
Plaintiff:
Damon McDowell
Defendant:
Town of Sophia , Town Council of Sophia , Sophia Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Teter v. Childers et al
as 1:2011cv00204
Plaintiff:
Floyd Teter, Jr.
Defendant:
Justin Burke Childers and Town of Terra Alta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arumuganathan v. West Virginia University Hospitals-East, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv00091
Plaintiff:
Thanigasalam Arumuganathan, M.D.
Defendant:
West Virginia University Hospitals-East, Inc. , Richard Pill , Walter Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray v. Cutlip et al
as 2:2011cv00078
Plaintiff:
Roger Ray
Defendant:
Kevin Cutlip and Town of Cowen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Williams v. Town of Alderson, West Virginia
as 5:2011cv00692
Plaintiff:
Todd Williams
Defendant:
Town of Alderson, West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Poe v. Town of Gilbert, West Virginia
as 2:2011cv00645
Plaintiff:
Verner Fred Poe, Jr.
Defendant:
Town of Gilbert, West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baptiste et al v. City of Charles Town, West Virginia et al
as 3:2011cv00073
Plaintiff:
Indony Jean Baptiste and Drix Jean Baptiste
Defendant:
City of Charles Town, West Virginia and Five Unknown Police Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Hull et al
as 5:2011cv00181
Plaintiff:
Andre Thomas
Defendant:
M. E. Hull and Town of Mabscott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hays v. Town of Gauley Bridge, West Virginia
as 2:2009cv01272
Plaintiff:
Rodney E. Hays
Defendant:
Town of Gauley Bridge West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
