Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Evans v. Lewis et al
as 1:2009cv05635
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Evans, Lonnie Evans, Lonnie Evans and others
Defendant:
J Lewis, John Doe # 210 and Village Of Hazel Crest
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Estate of Mr. Marvin J. Lewis v. Mesa, City of, et al
as 2:2009cv00732
Plaintiff:
Estate of Mr. Marvin J. Lewis
Defendant:
Mesa, City of, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lewis v. Nevada Sex Offender Registry
as 2:2008cv01706
Plaintiff:
Jeremi J. Lewis
Defendant:
Nevada Sex Offender Registry
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Brown v. Lewis et al
as 4:2008cv00150
Plaintiff:
Joaquin Brown
Defendant:
Rachel J Lewis, James Lewis, Richard Hagler and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Brown v. Lewis et al
as 4:2008cv00150
Plaintiff:
Joaquin Brown
Defendant:
Rachel J Lewis, James Lewis, Richard Hagler and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
West v. Lewis et al
as 1:2008cv01568
Plaintiff:
Aredus West, Aredus West, Aredus West and others
Defendant:
J Lewis, John Does 1 - 2 and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lewis v. Cassette et al
as 5:2008cv10818
Plaintiff:
David J Lewis and David J Lewis
Defendant:
Christopher Cassette, Brian Klonowski, W Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Lewis, Barbara J., et al v. Fenty, Adrian, et al
as 08-7027
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Barbara J. Lewis and Radcliffe B. Lewis
Defendant - Appellee:
Adrian Fenty, Mayor, Government of the District of Columbia, (In its official thereof), Natwar M. Gandhi, Government of the District of Columbia, H. Dean Bouland, Verritas Trust, Esquire Bouland and Brush, L.L.C. also known as H. Dean Bouland and others
LEWIS, et al v. FENTY et al
as 1:2008cv00120
Defendant:
ADRIAN FENTY, NATWAR M. GANDHI, H. DEAN BOULAND and others
Plaintiff:
BARBARA J. LEWIS and RADCLIFFE B. LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
