Cases 21 - 27 of 27
Mitchell v. BJ Services Company
as 4:2010cv01214
Defendant:
BJ Services Company
Plaintiff:
Michael Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Worthington v. Washington State Attorney General's Office et al
as 2:2010cv00118
Plaintiff:
John Worthington
Defendant:
Washington State Attorney General's Office, Christine Gregoire, Rob McKenna and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
LABAR v. ALERCIA et al
as 5:2009cv04182
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LABAR and DANIEL LABAR
Defendant:
JAMES T. ALERCIA, KEITH BORDER, THOMAS VOGEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bruce et al v. New York City et al
as 1:2008cv04512
Plaintiff:
Terrance Bruce, Julius Goodwin, Michael Mitchell and others
Defendant:
New York City, Robert Johnson and John Doe
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Javier Bravo, Sr., et al v. City of Santa Maria, et al
as 08-56631
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JAVIER BRAVO, Sr., HOPE BRAVO and E. B., a minor by her Guardian ad Litem Sara Gonzales
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL MITCHELL, in both their personal and official capacities, MITCHELL JAN, Santa Barbara Police SGT, in both their personal and official capacities, ED OLSEN, Santa Barbara Police SGT, in both their personal and official capacities and others
Defendant:
CITY OF SANTA MARIA, DANNY R. MACAGNI, Santa Maria Police Chief, LOUIS TANORE, Santa Maria Police Detective and others
Jackson v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2008cv01987
Plaintiff:
Terrance Jackson
Defendant:
The City of New York, Michael Mitchell, John Does 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Crescent River Port, et al
as 07-30525
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL MITCHELL
Defendant - Appellee:
CRESCENT RIVER PORT PILOTS ASSOCIATION INC, ALLEN J GIBBS, in his individual and personal capacity, BOARD OF RIVER PORT PILOTS COMMISSIONERS FOR THE PORT OF NEW ORLEANS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
