Cases 31 - 37 of 37
Ryan McFadyen v. Patrick Baker
as 11-1460
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RYAN MCFADYEN, MATTHEW WILSON and BRECK ARCHER
Defendant - Appellant:
PATRICK BAKER, STEVEN W. CHALMERS, RONALD HODGE and others
Defendant:
DUKE UNIVERSITY, DUKE UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, AARON GRAVES and others
HARR v. BRODHEAD et al
as 1:2011cv00263
Plaintiff:
SIDNEY B. HARR
Defendant:
RICHARD H. BRODHEAD , DAVID F. LEVI and DUKE UNIVERSITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
CARRINGTON et al v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2008cv00119
Plaintiff:
EDWARD CARRINGTON, CASEY J. CARROLL, MICHAEL P. CATALINO and others
Defendant:
DUKE UNIVERSITY, DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., RICHARD BRODHEAD and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ALLEN v. DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER et al
as 1:2009cv00220
Plaintiff:
MELISSA ALLEN
Defendant:
DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER, PHYLLIS LEPPERT, M.D. and BEVERLY THORPE
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LOCUS et al v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2008cv00607
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY LYNETTE LOCUS and BESSIE CARPENTER LOCUS
Defendant:
DUKE UNIVERSITY, RICHARD H. BRODHEAD, PHD, PETER LANGE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LOCUS et al v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2008cv00192
Defendant:
DUKE UNIVERSITY, RICHARD H. BRODHEAD, PETER LANGE and others
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY LYNETTE LOCUS and BESSIE CARPENTER LOCUS
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kwabena Mawulawde v. Board of Regents of the Univer
as 08-1317
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KWABENA MAWULAWDE, MD
Defendant - None:
BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY SYSTEM OF GEORGIA, DANIEL W. RAHN, MD, Indiv. and in his Official Capacity as President, Medical School of Georgia, DAVID STERN, MD, Indiv. and his Official Capacity as Dean, School of Medicine, Medical College of Georgia and others
Movant - Appellee:
DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED and DUKE UNIVERSITY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
