Cases 31 - 40 of 89
Santiago et al v. City of Springfield et al
as 1:2019cv11868
Defendant:
Misial Rodriguez, John Barbieri, Domenic J. Sarno and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe 1 - 4 and Angel Santiago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Santiago v. City of Springfield et al
as 1:2019cv11869
Defendant:
Misial Rodriguez, John Barbieri, Domenic J. Sarno and others
Plaintiff:
Angel Santiago
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Regis et al v William Gross, et al.
as 1:2019cv10527
Plaintiff:
Jean Regis and Verlande Regis
Defendant:
Matthew Pieroway, William Feeney, John Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee v. Town of Dartmouth et al
as 1:2019cv11036
Defendant:
Town of Dartmouth, Gregory W Barnes, Frank S Gracie, III and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy M Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Haspell et al
as 1:2019cv11083
Defendant:
John Doe #5, John Doe #4, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Harvey Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Penate v. Scampini et al
as 4:2019cv40054
Defendant:
Daniel F. Sullivan, Donna Brissette, John Does 1 through 8 and others
Plaintiff:
Chief of Police Gary J. Gemme and Isaura Penate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Estes v. Wynn et al
as 3:2019cv30021
Defendant:
Sean Klink, Police Chief Michael J. Wynn, Dale Eason and others
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Estes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thiersaint v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2018cv12406
Defendant:
William Chambers, John Doe 11-16, John Doe 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Emmanual Thiersaint and Emmanuel Thiersaint
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0794
Paris v. City of Worcester et al
as 4:2018cv40169
Defendant:
City of Worcester, Officers John Doe 1-4, Nathan Reando and others
Plaintiff:
Michael J Paris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gray v. Aoun et al
as 1:2018cv11825
Defendant:
Christopher Franson, Mark Nardone, Elizabeth Hudson and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew Gray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
