Cases 31 - 40 of 210
R.N., et al v. Mark Redal, et al
as 17-35638
Plaintiff - Appellant:
R.N., individually, J.W., individually and S.C., individually
Defendant - Appellee:
MARK REDAL, individually, MICHAEL J. CROWE, individually, STEVEN C. ENNETT, individually and others
Kando v. RI Board of Elections, et al
as 17-1635
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT KANDO
Defendant - Appellee:
RHODE ISLAND STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, RICHARD DUBOIS, Individually and in his official capacity as Chair of the Board of Elections, DIANE L. MEDEROS, Individually and in her official capacity as Vice Chair of the Board of Elections and others
Michael Mead v. Calvin Shaw
as 17-1677
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL MEAD
Defendant - Appellee:
CALVIN SHAW, Individually and in his capacity as Captain of the Gaston County Police Department, REGINALD BLOOM, Individually and in his official capacity as a Detective for the Gaston County Police Department, WILLIAM SAMPSON, Individually and in his capacity as a Detective for the Gaston County Police Department and others
Defendant:
GASTON COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, NORTH CAROLINA STATE BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONS, WILLIAM J. FARLEY, Individually and in his capacity as the Chief of Police for the Gaston County Police Department and others
Movant:
WILLIAM STETZER
Melissa Nihiser v. Lonnie Lutz, et al
as 17-1900
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELISSA NIHISER
Defendant - Appellee:
LONNIE L. LUTZ, individually and in his official capacity as Coles County Public Defender, C. STEPHEN FERGUSON, individually and in his official capacity as Coles County State's Attorney and COLES COUNTY, ILLINOIS
Jayantibhai Patel, et al v. City of Long Beach, et al
as 17-55411
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAYANTIBHAI PATEL, Individual and all others similarly situated and Plaintiff Tenants, DBA Princess Inn, PRAVIN L. PATEL, Individual and all others similarly situated and Plaintiff Tenants, DIPAK L. PATEL, Individual and all others similarly situated and Plaintiff Tenants and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF LONG BEACH, a municipal corporation and DOES, 1-10, inclusive
Cedric Anderson v. Law Office of Timothy Martella, et al
as 17-55230
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CEDRIC L. ANDERSON, individually and as the parent, natural guardian and next friend on behalf of K.A., V.A., K.A., A.A., S.A., H.A., C.A. AND S.A
Defendant - Appellee:
LAW OFFICE OF TIMOTHY MARTELLA, TIMOTHY MARTELLA, RACHEL EWING and others
Lennie Williams v. County of Los Angeles Ca, et al
as 17-55183
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LENNIE WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SOCIAL SERVICE, PHILIP L. BROWNING, individually and as Director for the County of Los Angeles Department of Public Social Services (D.P.S.S.), JON MINATO, individually and as Chief for the County of Los Angeles, Department of Public Social Services (D.P.S.S.) Line Operations Division II and others
Thaddeus Jones, et al v. Michelle Qualkinbush, et al
as 17-1227
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THADDEUS JONES, individually, STEVON GRANT, individually and as a Member of Calumet City Concerned Citizens and CALUMET CITY CONCERNED CITIZENS, an Illinois political action committee
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHELLE QUALKINBUSH, individually and her official capacity as Mayor of the City of Calumet City, Illinois, NYOTA FIGGS, individually and in her official capacity as City Clerk for the City of Calumet City, Illinois, MAGDALENA L. WOSCZYNSKI, individually and in her official capacity as Alderman of the City of Calumet City, Illinois and others
Justin Forsman v. Daniel Stahnke
as 16-36058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JUSTIN MATTHEW FORSMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
DANIEL L. STAHNKE, individually, and in his/her official capacity as Justice of the Superior Court of Clark County, WA
Daniel Willis v. Town of Trenton, NC
as 16-2422
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANIEL JOHNSON WILLIS
Respondent - Appellee:
TOWN OF TRENTON, NORTH CAROLINA, DAN WOOTEN, Individually and as Leading Attorney, CAROL M. HOOD, Individually and as Personal Representative and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
