Cases 31 - 40 of 74
Kimberly Vifinkle v. US
as 23-1248
Plaintiff:
BRANDEE RITSEMA, LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, LORA BYERS and others
Not Yet Classified:
KIMBERLY VIFINKLE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Renesha Tomlin v. US
as 23-1258
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RENESHA TOMLIN
Plaintiff:
LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Alan Meddows v. US
as 23-1272
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALAN MEDDOWS
Plaintiff:
LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Kristen Clark-Hassel v. US
as 23-1261
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KRISTEN CLARK-HASSEL and KRISTEN CLARK-HASSELL
Plaintiff:
LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, KIMBERLY VIFINKLE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Emily O'Dell v. US
as 23-1216
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EMILY O'DELL and WILLIAM O'DELL
Plaintiff:
BRANDEE RITSEMA, LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, BEATRICE RIVERA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Elizabeth Andrews v. US
as 23-1164
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELIZABETH ANDREWS
Plaintiff:
LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, BEATRICE RIVERA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Jessica Kirby v. US
as 23-1219
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JESSICA KIRBY
Plaintiff:
BRANDEE RITSEMA, LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, BEATRICE RIVERA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Brandee Ritsema v. US
as 23-1162
Plaintiff / Appellant:
BRANDEE RITSEMA
Plaintiff:
LAURIE REYNOLDS, CECELIA EVERTEZ, RAYMOND SIPULT and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
BEATRICE RIVERA ADAMS, AUDREY LESSNER, BEATRICE RIVERA and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOE BIDEN, President of the United States Department, KAMALA D. HARRIS, Vice President of the United States and others
Reynolds et al v. United States Government et al
as 7:2022cv00178
Plaintiff:
Save Our Children Truth Commission, Melody Rodgers, Malachi Chapman and others
Defendant:
United States Government, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Dana Davis, Lora Byers, Kimberly Vifinkle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights
Antonello Boldrini v. Ktt, et al
as 22-3015
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTONELLO BOLDRINI
Defendant:
KTT, Jane Doe, personally in her official capacity of Director of Operations, SIEDEL, John Doe (D), personally and in his official capacity as U.S. Marshal Guard, CHRIS HILL, U.S.M. 2019-2022, personally and his official capacity as USM Detective and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
