Cases 41 - 50 of 63
Adams v. USA
as 3:2017cv00129
Plaintiff:
Raymond E Adams, II
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hoskyn v. Hunter et al
as 4:2017cv00133
Plaintiff:
Charles Hoskyn
Defendant:
S Kyle Hunter, Karres D Manning, Arkansas, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Adams v. USA
as 3:2017cv00035
Plaintiff:
Raymond E Adams, II
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kiesling et al v. Holladay et al
as 4:2015cv00390
Plaintiff:
Christopher Kiesling and Katy Kiesling
Defendant:
Doc Holladay , Mark Swagerty , Cardarious Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jarboe v. Washington County, Arkansas et al
as 5:2015cv05133
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Jarboe
Defendant:
Washington County, Arkansas, Marilyn Edwards, Dan Short and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fernald et al v. Robertson et al
as 4:2015cv00211
Plaintiff:
Richard Jeffery Fernald and Catherine Mathis
Defendant:
Adam Robertson , James Potter , Joseph Breaux and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gall et al v. Robertson et al
as 4:2015cv00210
Plaintiff:
Stacy Gall and Cathie Gall
Defendant:
Adam Robertson , James Potter , James Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClain et al v. Robertson et al
as 4:2015cv00073
Plaintiff:
Martin McClain , Ashley McDaniel , Stacy Gall and others
Defendant:
Adam Robertson , James Potter , Joseph Breaux and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Adams et al
as 4:2013cv00456
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Anna G Eshoo, New York Post, Sherwood Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Adams v. Cradduck et al
as 5:2013cv05074
Plaintiff:
Yves Eugene Adams , Cesar Reyes, Pam Philpott and others
Defendant:
Kelly Cradduck and Keefe Commissary Network, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
