Other Civil Rights Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 78
Anesh Gupta v. Lana Vahab, et al
as 12-15162
Plaintiff - Appellant: ANESH GUPTA
Defendant - Appellee: LANA LUNSKAYA VAHAB, Trial Attorney, United States Department of Justice, J. MAX WEINTRAUB, Sr. Litigation Counsel, United States Department of Justice, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Laurack Bray v. U.S. Department of Justice, et al
as 12-56815
Plaintiff - Appellant: LAURACK D. BRAY
Defendant - Appellee: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General and others
Defendant - Real Party In Interest: HAROLD JAMES GRIFFITH, GREGORY SECOR, JEANETTE M. ANDREWS and others
Rossman v. Darling
as 12-3717
Plaintiff - Appellant: Brud Rossman
Defendant - Appellee: David Darling, Chief of Police, Village of Catskill Police Department, Vincent Seeley, Trustee, Village of Catskill, New York, Thomas Spota, District Attorney, Suffolk County, New York and others
Greg Kroupa v. Peter Nielsen, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-2843
Plaintiff - Appellee: Greg Kroupa, guardian ad litem of B.K., a minor
Defendant - Appellant: Peter A. Nielsen, individually and in his official capacity as Assistant Director of 4-H Youth Development and Rod Geppert, individually and in his official capacity as Brule County Extension 4-H representative
Defendant: 4-H, a South Dakota Unincorporated Association, John Does and Mary Does, of the South Dakota 4-H Livestock Ethics Committee unidentified in any communication from the other Defendants or in the 2011 South Dakota 4-H Division Handbook of the South Dakota Cooperative Extension Service in their individual and official
Gupta v. Trial Attorney, United States Department of Justice et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2012cv01097
Plaintiff: Anesh Gupta
Defendant: Lana L. Vahab, J. Max Weintraub, Assistant Director Office of Immigration Litigation United States Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Laurack D. Bray v. Department of Justice U.S. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv05704
Real Party In Interest Defendant: Jeanette M. Andrews, Helen H. Davis, Harold James Griffith and others
Defendant: Andre Birotte, Department of Justice U.S., Patrick R. Donohue and others
Plaintiff: Laurack D Bray
Hamzik v. Office for People with Develop
as 12-2400
Plaintiff - Appellant: John J. Hamzik
Defendant - Appellee: Office for People with Developmental Disabilities, Broome Developmental Center, Coleen Fadden, Director of Personnel (BDC) in official capacity and in individual capacity and others
Ferdie Gaudet, III v. City of Kenner, et al
as 12-30604
Plaintiff - Appellant: FERDIE GAUDET, III
Defendant - Appellee: KENNER CITY, through its Mayor Michael Yenni, MICHAEL YENNI, Mayor of City of Kenner, TAMITHA SHAW, Director of Code Enforcement and Inspections and others
Timothy Whiting v. Stan Henry, et al
as 11-56246
Plaintiff - Appellant: TIMOTHY LEWIS WHITING
Defendant - Appellee: STAN HENRY, former Chief of Police, in his individual capacity as a peace officer with the Cathedral City Police Department, STANLEY SNIFF, individually as Sheriff of Riverside County, DAVID G. DOMINGUEZ, former Chief of Police, in his individual capacity as a peace officer with the Palm Springs Police Department and others
Surety Corporation of America v. Leon Cannizzaro, Jr., et al
as 11-30533
Plaintiff - Appellant: SURETY CORPORATION OF AMERICA, a Florida Corporation
Defendant - Appellee: LEON A. CANNIZZARO, JR., in his official capacity as District Attorney for the Parish of Orleans, State of Louisiana, GRAYMOND MARTIN, in his official capacity as Assistant District Attorney for the Parish of Orleans, State of Louisiana, MICHAEL B. REDMANN, in his official capacity as Assistant Director for the Parish of Orleans, State of Louisiana and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?