Cases 41 - 50 of 66
Colvin v. City of Raleigh et al
as 5:2014cv00891
Plaintiff:
Eric Colvin
Defendant:
City of Raleigh , Raleigh Police Department and DD Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hatley, et al v. Bowden, et al
as 5:2013cv00765
Plaintiff:
Anika Hatley and Amy Hatley
Defendant:
Bowden, City of Raleigh and City of Raleigh Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wilcoxson v. The City of Raleigh, et al
as 5:2013cv00732
Plaintiff:
Emmerli Wilcoxson
Defendant:
The City of Raleigh , Raleigh Police Department, Diana Painter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Davis v. Matroo et al
as 5:2013cv00233
Plaintiff:
James Preston Davis
Defendant:
Ronald Matroo , Charles McGinley, Brian Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Adams v. The City of Raleigh et al
as 5:2012cv00524
Plaintiff:
Kenneth C. Adams
Defendant:
The City of Raleigh and Officer M. T. McKee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
New Hope Christian Church et al v. City of Raleigh
as 5:2012cv00426
Plaintiff:
New Hope Christian Church and John A. Page
Defendant:
City of Raleigh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. City of Raleigh, et al
as 5:2012cv00210
Plaintiff:
Marcus Jermaine Johnson
Defendant:
City of Raleigh , M. W. Banks , A. M. Gibbons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dunston v. Egan, et al
as 5:2011cv00677
Plaintiff:
Eugene N. Dunston
Defendant:
Officer D. P. Egan and City of Raleigh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Khadirah El-Bey v. City of Raleigh Police Dept
as 11-2026
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KHADIRAH MA'AT T. EL-BEY and ASARU ALIM N.T. EL-BEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF RALEIGH POLICE DEPARTMENT, J. S. VARNELL, DAVID SHELTON and others
Artis v. Harrison, et al
as 5:2011cv00457
Defendant:
Donnie Harrison , The City of Raleigh , Wake County and others
Plaintiff:
Lynwood Earl Artis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
