Cases 41 - 50 of 165
Windless v. Avergis et al
as 2:2022cv02754
Plaintiff:
Demetra Elaine Windless
Defendant:
Doctor John Avergis, Doctor Mary Keegan, Lisa Canady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
El Bey v. Crocilla
as 22-2773
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Queen Prinyah Godiah NMIAA El Bey
Defendant / Appellee:
Leyland Crocilla, MTA Police Officer, Badge 2477, MTA, MTA 34 Precinct, 34th Street Penn Station on 7th Ave. and others
Zawadzki v. Dept. of Justice
as 1:2022cv08502
Petitioner:
Kryst Zawadzki
Respondent:
Dept. of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jimenez v. Dept. of Justice
as 1:2022cv08500
Petitioner:
Jose Sanchez Jimenez
Respondent:
Dept. of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Jackson et al v. Housing & Urban Development et al
as 5:2022cv05228
Plaintiff:
Barbara Fenelon Jackson and Cheryl L Fenelon
Defendant:
U S Dept of Housing & Urban Development, Louisiana Housing Corp, Louisiana Office of Community Development and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yil Jo v. Dept. of Justice
as 1:2022cv07699
Petitioner:
Young Yil Jo
Respondent:
Dept. of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Zawadzki v. Dept. of Justice
as 1:2022cv07701
Plaintiff:
Kryst Zawadzki
Defendant:
Dept. of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Kryst Zawadzki v. Dept of Justice
as 2:2022cv06389
Plaintiff:
Kryst Zawadzki
Defendant:
Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
QUINN v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2022cv02526
Plaintiff:
ANDREW QUINN
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN RESOURCES, SHERIFF DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
QUINN v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
as 1:2022cv02523
Plaintiff:
ANDREW QUINN
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and US DEPT OF JUSTICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
