Cases 51 - 60 of 5,058
People Of The State Of Illinois v. Valez
as 1:2024cv05835
Defendant:
Peter Valez
Plaintiff:
People Of The State Of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Grabenhorst v. Peters et al
as 4:2024cv11782
Plaintiff:
Nathan Grabenhorst
Defendant:
Wyatt Peters, Carter May and Katherine Comstock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Litchmore-Smith v. Alan J. Waintraub, Esq. et al
as 1:2024cv04879
Respondent:
Lester Wayne Meckey, Damion Mills, Bradley Marsh and others
Petitioner:
Florence F. Litchmore-Smith and Florence F. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 vc
Moulay Tidriri v. Board of Regents, et al
as 24-2425
Defendant:
George A. Carroll, Assistant Iowa Attorney General, Board of Regents, Bob Donley, Former President of the Board of Regents and others
Plaintiff:
Moulay Tidriri
Gosier v. City of Utica et al
as 6:2024cv00845
Defendant:
Peter Paladino, Jariel Rodriguez, Officer Amuso and others
Plaintiff:
Willie Thomas Gosier and Willie T. Gosier, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fleurimond v. Lerman et al
as 1:2024cv04774
Defendant:
Peter Stoute, North Shore - LIJ Medical, PC, Jeffrey G. Lerman, ESQ. and others
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Fleurimond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Shanae Dillihunt v. Ya i Heki Regional Indian Museum et al
as 5:2024cv01443
Defendant:
Felix Chevrolet, Veterans Memorial Park, California Science Museum and others
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peter Smith v. Governor of Alabama, et al
as 24-12177
Defendant:
ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES, GOVERNOR OF ALABAMA, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES FOOD STAMP DIVISION and others
Plaintiff:
PETER J. SMITH
Peter Smith v. Governor of the State of Alabama, et al
as 24-12178
Defendant:
FOOD ASSISTANCE DIRECTOR AT STATE OF ALABAMA, CHRIS PRINGLE, REED and others
Plaintiff:
PETER J. SMITH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
