Cases 61 - 70 of 106
Watkins v. Greyhound Lines Incorporated et al
as 3:2016cv01265
Plaintiff:
Donald Watkins
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines Incorporated, Nikki and Alonzo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Melinda Mckinzie v. Barack Obama, et al
as 15-5165
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Melinda Mckinzie
Defendant - Appellee:
Barack Hussein Obama, "BARRY", personally and in his official capacity, Michelle Lavaughn Robinson Obama, personally and in her official capacity, James B. Comey, FBI, personally and in his official capacity and others
MCKINZIE v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2015cv00483
Plaintiff:
MELINDA MCKINZIE
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, MICHELLE LAVAUGHN ROBINSON OBAMA, JAMES B. COMEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Braddock v. Prator et al
as 5:2015cv00822
Plaintiff:
Barbara Ann Braddock
Defendant:
Steve Prator, Hilton Shreveport, Greyhound Lines Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nako v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
as 1:2015cv00246
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Nontle Nako
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Greene v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
as 2:2015cv00115
Plaintiff:
Cedric Greene
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reaves v. Greyhound Lines San Francisco Calif
as 3:2014cv00657
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Reaves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Seals v. CUNY et al
as 1:2014cv06123
Plaintiff:
Tina Seals
Defendant:
CUNY, City College of New York, Debt Collection Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cherie Phillips, et al v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.
as 14-15945
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHERIE PHILLIPS and ERLINE PHILLIPS
Defendant - Appellee:
GREYHOUND LINES, INC.
Zvunca v. Maddux et al
as 1:2014cv02609
Plaintiff:
Cristina Zvunca
Defendant:
William J Maddux , Daniel M Locallo, William J Haddad and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
