Cases 61 - 70 of 85
Trent v. Roberts et al
as 1:2012cv00329
Plaintiff:
Jerry Justin Trent
Defendant:
Richard B. Roberts, The State of North Carolina, Steve E. Brooks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Morrison v. Holding et al
as 7:2012cv00253
Plaintiff:
Donald L. Morrison
Defendant:
George E.B. Holding, David Cortes, Wayne R. Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Moorish Holy Temple of Science of the World, et al v. Terry, et al
as 5:2012cv00134
Plaintiff:
Moorish Holy Temple of Science of the World, Khadirah Ma'at Tu'pak El-Bey and Asaru Alim Nu Tu'pak El-Bey
Defendant:
B.J. Terry and Wayne Bowen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Orr v. Banks
as 5:2011cv00536
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wayne Orr
Defendant:
J. Henry Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morrison v. Holding et al
as 7:2011cv00168
Plaintiff:
Donald L. Morrison
Defendant:
George E.B. Holding, Dennis M. Duffy, S. Katherine Burnette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Pitts et al v. United States Housing and Urban Development et al
as 5:2011cv00223
Plaintiff:
Alan Pitts and Seneca Nicholson
Defendant:
United States Housing and Urban Development, Atlanta Home Ownership Center, Jennifer Harry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Campbell v. Gaither et al
as 3:2011cv00190
Plaintiff:
Roy Lane Campbell
Defendant:
Wayne Gaither and Ian Gaither
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KLUTTZ v. HOUPE, et al
as 1:2011cv00199
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR KLUTTZ
Defendant:
PRESTON GENE HOUPE and THE TOWN OF SPENCER
Mediator:
WAYNE P. HUCKEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Armstrong v. Purdue et al
as 5:2011cv00073
Plaintiff:
Arthur O. Armstrong
Defendant:
Beverly Purdue, Eugene Conti, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McNair v. Rocky Mount Police Dept et al
as 5:2010cv00561
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. McNair
Defendant:
Rocky Mount Police Dept, J. Wayne Sears and Jenny L. Matthews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
