Cases 71 - 80 of 212
LOPE v. COMMUNITY EDUCATION CENTERS et al
as 2:2017cv05004
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LOPE
Defendant:
COMMUNITY EDUCATION CENTERS and GEO GROUP, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHURCHILL v. GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 1:2017cv03887
Defendant:
BARDONNER, CORIZON HEALTH, GLOVER and others
Plaintiff:
KENT CHURCHILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodriguez v. GEO Group Inc et al
as 5:2017cv01149
Plaintiff:
Jamie Rodriguez
Defendant:
GEO Group Inc , Hector Rios , Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Littlejohn
as 4:2017cv00047
Defendant:
GEO Group and REEVES COUNTY DETENTION CENTER I&II
Plaintiff:
Mrs Nora O. Littlejohn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
TAYLOR et al v. CORIZON, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv03346
Defendant:
DR.VICKI BURDINE, J. BUSCH, THE GEO GROUP and others
Plaintiff:
GREGORY TAYLOR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
M.M. v. Lea County Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2017cv00721
Plaintiff:
M. M.
Defendant:
Lea County Correctional Facility , Jeff Wrigley, John Beaird and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Griego v. GEO Group Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00538
Plaintiff:
Howard E. Griego
Defendant:
Geo Group, Inc. , Aaron Maestas , Albert Gutierrez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ibezim v. The GEO Group, Inc.
as 9:2017cv80572
Plaintiff:
Michael Ibezim
Defendant:
The GEO Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Diaz v. United States of America
as 1:2017cv00041
Plaintiff:
Jesus Manuel Diaz
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Bureau of Prisons, The Geo Group Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
M.M. v. Guadalupe County Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2017cv00005
Plaintiff:
M. M.
Defendant:
Guadalupe County Correctional Facility , FNU Horton/Bravo , Mark Walden and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
