Cases 1 - 10 of 10
JOHNSON v. PFEIFFER UNIVERSITY et al.
as 1:2023cv01087
Plaintiff:
TAL JOHNSON, JR.
Defendant:
PFEIFFER UNIVERISTY, SUSAN BLAIR, ELIZABETH FAIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Teasley v. O'Neal et al
as 5:2023cv00336
Plaintiff:
Kenya Teasley
Defendant:
Tasha O'Neal and F. Blair Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Courthouse News Service v. Boyce et al
as 5:2023cv00280
Plaintiff:
Courthouse News Service
Defendant:
Director of NCAOC Ryan Boyce, Clerk Michelle Ball, Clerk Renee Whittenton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Etienne v. Sanders et al
as 5:2023cv00214
Respondent:
KAREN REA PERKINS, MACHELLE SANDERS, TAMMIE ELAINE HALL and others
Petitioner:
DINEEN CHERYLANN ETIENNE
Defendant:
Reserve at Carrington Place
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Verrinder v. Williams et al
as 5:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
William Verrinder
Defendant:
Frank Blair Williams, Stacy Pretty, Tyler Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Teasley v. O'Neal et al
as 5:2022cv00115
Plaintiff:
Kenya Teasley
Defendant:
Tasha O'Neal and F. Blair Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pahlke et al v. Blair et al
as 3:2019cv00012
Defendant:
James Paul Blair, The City of Lowell, Scott Bates and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe, Karen Vaughn and Paige L. Pahlke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hester v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2017cv00174
Plaintiff:
Valerie K. Hester
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Office of Disability Adjudication and Review, Nancy Berryhill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HESTER v. BISER
as 1:2016cv00911
Plaintiff:
VALERIE HESTER
Defendant:
JONATHAN BLAIR BISER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Alexander v. Barrero et al
as 5:2012cv00190
Plaintiff:
Lewis Eugene Alexander, Jr.
Defendant:
Julia Barrero, Tom Watson, Aaron Barlow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
