Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Phillips v. City of Satsuma et al
as 1:2023cv00401
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Phillips
Defendant:
City of Satsuma, Heather Davis, Clint Harrell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barnes v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2022cv00149
Plaintiff:
Tatonia Barnes
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Alabama Department of Corrections Central Records Department Of Montgomery AL, USA Medical Center Hospital Medical Examiner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Barnes v. City of Opelika, Alabama et al
as 3:2022cv00138
Plaintiff:
Herman Barnes
Defendant:
City of Opelika, Alabama and Marty Ogren
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harmon v. Alabama, State of et al
as 1:2021cv00947
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Claude Harmon, Jr
Defendant:
Alabama, State of, Calhoun County, Cleburne County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rose v. Coley et al
as 3:2020cv00713
Defendant:
Ruthie Carpenter, Kenneth Barnes, Tommy Pugh and others
Plaintiff:
Mark Rose
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards et al v. Mashego et al
as 2:2018cv01954
Defendant:
Yolanda Barnes, Kim Mashego, Corrine Matt and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Edwards, Bobbi Edwards, K. E. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Barnes v. Smith
as 3:2018cv00929
Plaintiff:
Michael Barnes
Defendant:
Bryan Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kling v. Barnes
as 2:2018cv00572
Plaintiff:
James Kling
Defendant:
Lee Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
King v. Moore et al
as 2:2017cv01394
Plaintiff:
James Alan King
Defendant:
Charles Moore, Michael S Beane, Terry Bearden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes v. Corizon Health, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00862
Plaintiff:
Jamie Barnes
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Inc. , Corizon, Inc. , Michael Bradford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
