Cases 1 - 10 of 69
Clark v. Kerley
as 2:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Jason Michael Clark
Defendant:
Jonathan Kerley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clayborne v. Basaldua et al
as 4:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Bianca Clayborne
Defendant:
Ruben Basaldua, Donnie Clark, Douglas Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hardin v. Jordan et al
as 3:2023cv00375
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Jabril Hardin
Defendant:
Austin Jordan, Luke Johnson, Robert Wiesenberg and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Johnson v. Facebook et al
as 2:2023cv00116
Plaintiff:
Robert W Johnson
Defendant:
Facebook, Meta LLC., Rudy Giuliani and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Whitman v. Blount County et al
as 3:2023cv00033
Plaintiff:
Aaron Whitman
Defendant:
Blount County, Paul Grady, TBI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. CITY OF MEMPHIS (MEMPHIS POLICE DEPARTMENT) et al
as 2:2022cv02641
Plaintiff:
Mr. Lorenzo Clark
Defendant:
CITY OF MEMPHIS (MEMPHIS POLICE DEPARTMENT), City of Memphis, Crystal Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Millen v. Clark et al
as 2:2022cv02524
Plaintiff:
Kevin Millen
Defendant:
James Clark and Doris Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. Jackson
as 1:2021cv00303
Plaintiff:
Ms. Rachel Clark and Rachel Clark
Defendant:
William L. Jackson and William L. Jackson Official Capacity as the CEO of Chattanooga-Hamilton Hospital d/b/a Erlanger Health System
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rolston et al v. Robinson-Coffee et al
as 3:2021cv00888
Plaintiff:
Robert Rolston and Catherine R. Dunlap-Rolston
Defendant:
Tracey Robinson-Coffee, Dianne Turner, Estate of William Faimon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Millen v. DeJoy et al
as 2:2021cv02734
Plaintiff:
Kevin Millen
Defendant:
Louis DeJoy and James Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
