Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Lockhart v. Siloam Springs, Arkansas et al
as 5:2022cv05040
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lockhart
Defendant:
Siloam Springs, Arkansas, James Wilmet, Allan Gilbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cross v. Cross et al
as 3:2021cv00264
Plaintiff:
Melissa Moody Cross
Defendant:
Katrina Cross, Elembaugh, Rodney Cross and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Verges-Rodriguez v. Bailey et al
as 5:2021cv05148
Plaintiff:
Miguel Verges-Rodriguez
Defendant:
Stewart Bailey and Richard Huddler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Easley et al
as 4:2019cv00546
Plaintiff:
Ronald Bailey
Defendant:
Ron Ball, Wendy Kelley, Gregory Crain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowman v. Hot Spring County, Arkansas et al
as 4:2019cv00523
Defendant:
Woody, John Does, Hot Spring County Sheriff's Department and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jason Bowman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Easley et al
as 4:2019cv00063
Plaintiff:
Ronald Bailey
Defendant:
Ron Ball, Wendy Kelley, Gregory Crain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Novak et al
as 3:2018cv03022
Plaintiff:
Desire Kristin Brown
Defendant:
Rebecca Novak , Kimberly Flowers, Mark Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newell v. Bailey & Oliver P.A. et al
as 5:2017cv05028
Plaintiff:
Hannah Newell
Defendant:
Bailey & Oliver P.A. and Sach Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Phil Bailey Towing and Recovery, Inc. et al v. Rockport, City of
as 6:2010cv06005
Plaintiff:
Phil Bailey Towing and Recovery, Inc. and Beason Services, Inc.
Defendant:
Rockport, City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Bains v. West Memphis Arkansas, City of et al
as 3:2009cv00208
Plaintiff:
Gurwinder Bains
Defendant:
West Memphis Arkansas, City of, William H Johnson, Robert Paudert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
