Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Smith v. Tapley et al
as 4:2023cv00748
Plaintiff:
Kelton Smith
Defendant:
William Tapley, Lisa Mabry-Williams and Conway, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
McEwen v. Conder et al
as 4:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
Dezanae McEwen
Defendant:
Tiffany Conder, Kelton Smith, Samuel Fitzgerald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Byrd v. Tapley et al
as 4:2022cv01208
Plaintiff:
Brittany Byrd
Defendant:
William Tapley, Chris Harris, Clayton Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Bordock v. Morrilton, City of et al
as 4:2022cv00894
Plaintiff:
Laurie Bordock
Defendant:
Morrilton, City of and Conway, County of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Davis et al v. Handie et al
as 4:2021cv00616
Plaintiff:
Demond Davis and Ashley Munnerlyn Davis
Defendant:
Sharese Handie, Ferris McClain, Britt Little and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Conway, Arkansas, City of et al
as 4:2021cv00205
Defendant:
Jimmy Weser, Conway, Arkansas, City of, Tanner Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Kaala D Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lankford v. Plummerville Arkansas, City of et al
as 4:2019cv00619
Defendant:
Albert Duvall, Plummerville Arkansas, City of and Conway County, Arkansas
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lankford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scarbrough v. Conway, City of et al
as 4:2019cv00292
Defendant:
Conway, City of, Shona Osborne, William Tapley and others
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Scarbrough
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chaney et al v. Smith et al
as 4:2018cv00539
Plaintiff:
Elana Chaney and Buddy Eric Chaney
Defendant:
Timothy Sophn, Ken Eubanks, Does Deputies of Conway County Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Watlington et al
as 4:2018cv00289
Plaintiff:
Harvey Martin
Defendant:
Eugene Watlington, Martin Clifford, Brinton Ramoly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
