Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Yi Shao v. John Roberts, Jr., et al
as 22-15857
Plaintiff / Appellant:
YI TAI SHAO, AKA Linda Yi Tai Shao
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN G. ROBERTS, Jr., ANTHONY M. KENNEDY, STEPHEN G. BREYER and others
(PS) Shao v. Roberts, et al.
as 2:2022cv00325
Plaintiff:
Yi Tai Shao and Linda Shao
Defendant:
John G. Roberts, Jr., Anthony M. Kennedy, Stephen Breyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
v. SHAO et al
as 2:2022at00196
Defendant:
Yi Tai SHAO, John G. Roberts, Jr., Anthony M Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nascimento v. Fason et al
as 3:2021cv02605
Plaintiff:
Carlos Nascimento
Defendant:
Gregory Fason, Jeffrey Abeare, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bruce David Phillips v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2021cv00363
Defendant:
Officer Lear, City of Los Angeles, Does 1 - 15 and others
Plaintiff:
Bruce David Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Phillips et al v. City of Chico et al
as 2:2018at00081
Plaintiff:
David Phillips , Delphine Norman , Chadrick Ingram and others
Defendant:
City of Chico, Jeremy Gagnebin, Alex Fliehr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips et al v. City of Chico et al
as 2:2018cv00153
Plaintiff:
David Phillips , Delphine Norman , Chadrick Ingram and others
Defendant:
City of Chico, Jeremy Gagnebin, Alex Fliehr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOYERS v. WALTON COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT et al
as 3:2017cv00073
Plaintiff:
DAVID CALVIN MOYERS
Defendant:
WALTON COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT , W EUGENE M BENTON , KATHY K TROST and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deborah Hagedorn v. David Cattani, et al
as 16-4254
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DEBORAH HAGEDORN
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID CATTANI, GEOFFREY ESSER and DAVID PHILLIPS
Hagedorn v. Cattani et al
as 1:2015cv01381
Plaintiff:
Deborah Hagedorn
Defendant:
David Cattani , Geoffrey Esser and David Phillips
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
