Cases 1 - 10 of 18
LANCE v. DUKE UNIVERSITY
as 1:2023cv00666
Plaintiff:
Dr. Rachel Marie Lance
Defendant:
DUKE UNIVERSITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Henderson v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Association et al
as 5:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Glenn Henderson
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, Duke Energy Progress, LLC, Food Lion, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
HICKS v. DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC.
as 1:2022cv01071
Plaintiff:
CHRISTINE HICKS
Defendant:
DUKE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Jane Doe v. Duke University
as 5:2022cv00303
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Duke University
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
AZHAR v. DUKE UNIVERSITY
as 1:2020cv00187
Plaintiff:
Dr. Salman Azhar
Defendant:
DUKE UNIVERSITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Azhar v. DUKE UNIVERSITY
as 1:2020cv00182
Plaintiff:
Dr. Salman Azhar
Defendant:
DUKE UNIVERSITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HARR v. BRODHEAD et al
as 1:2016cv00304
Plaintiff:
SIDNEY B. HARR
Defendant:
RICHARD H. BRODHEAD, DAVID F. LEVI, DUKE UNIVERSITY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
MCFADYEN et al v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2007cv00953
Plaintiff:
RYAN MCFADYEN, MATTHEW WILSON and BRECK ARCHER
Defendant:
DUKE UNIVERSITY, DUKE UNIVERSITY POLICE DEPT., AARON GRAVES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
HARR v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2013cv00673
Plaintiff:
SIDNEY B. HARR
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA , THOMAS D. SCHROEDER, RICHARD H. BRODHEAD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MILLS v. DUKE UNIVERSITY et al
as 1:2012cv00447
Defendant:
DUKE UNIVERSITY, LARRY CARTER and JEFFREY LIBERTO
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM S. MILLS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
