Cases 1 - 9 of 9
TETMEYER v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2024cv00762
Plaintiff:
William Tetmeyer, Stefanie Straub and William Harting
Defendant:
City of Indianapolis, Sean Baukat, Trent Fortson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Porter v. Starks et al
as 2:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Reginald Darnell Porter
Defendant:
Christopher Starks, Mark S Watson, Natalie Bokota and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Andrews Jr. v. Bokota et al
as 2:2023cv00239
Plaintiff:
Leon E Andrews Jr.
Defendant:
Natalie Bokota, Kathleen A. Sullivan, Mark Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
J.S. v. ANDERSON COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2021cv02920
Plaintiff:
MISTY RIDDLE and J. S.
Defendant:
ANDERSON COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORPORATION and NATALIE COLLINS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
NAUGLE v. WHEELER et al
as 4:2021cv00105
Plaintiff:
BRAD S. NAUGLE and BRAD NAUGLE
Defendant:
OFFICER NATALIE K. BOLING, SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT, OFFICER TERRY J. WHEELER, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Klaassen et al v. The Trustees of Indiana University
as 1:2021cv00238
Plaintiff:
MACEY POLICKA, ASHLEE MORRIS, JAIME CARINI and others
Defendant:
The Trustees of Indiana University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
AYODELE v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2021cv01750
Defendant:
JASON DOUGLAS BUNCH, NATALIE KAY CARPENTER and STATE OF INDIANA
Plaintiff:
BODE AYODELE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STOLTZFUS et al v. HUTCHINS et al
as 2:2017cv00359
Defendant:
GEOFFREY CANFIELD, SHAWN CLOVER, JUSTIN COLE and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN RIEHL and JOHN STOLTZFUS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rogers v. Seybold et al
as 1:2015cv00361
Plaintiff:
Dewayne Rogers
Defendant:
Wayne Seybold, Tom Hunt, Mike Gilbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
