Cases 1 - 10 of 209
Richmond Road Partners, LLC, et al v. City of Warrensville Heights, OH, et al
as 24-3502
Plaintiff:
RICHMOND ROAD PARTNERS, LLC and STEP FORWARD
Defendant:
CITY OF WARRENSVILLE HEIGHTS, OH, CITY OF WARRENSVILLE HEIGHTS, OH PLANNING COMMISSION and CITY OF WARRENSVILLE HEIGHTS, OH BUILDING COMMISSIONER
Oh v. Dept of Justice
as 6:2024cv00961
Plaintiff:
Justin Yeol Oh
Defendant:
Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Curry v. Federal Government et al
as 1:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
Ashley Curry and Ashley Casanova
Defendant:
Federal Government doing business as President Joe Biden, Mike DeWine, Aftab Pureval and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Michael Skilwies v. City of Huber Heights, OH, et al
as 24-3407
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SKILWIES
Defendant:
CITY OF HUBER HEIGHTS, OH, CITY OF HUBER HEIGHTS CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF HUBER HEIGHTS PLANNING COMMISSION and others
John Cook v. David Boss, et al
as 24-3350
Plaintiff:
JOHN COOK
Defendant:
DAVID BOSS, KELLY VASAS, JONATHON ROMANIN and others
Michelle Rieg, et al v. Village of Seville, OH
as 24-3337
Plaintiff:
MICHELLE RIEG, BRIAN RIEG, SCOTT WANGLER and others
Defendant:
VILLAGE OF SEVILLE, OH
Intervenor:
NEO COMMERCE CENTER LLC
Jeffrey Rasawehr v. Jeff Grey, et al
as 24-3322
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY RASAWEHR
Defendant:
SHERIFF JEFF GREY, Mercer County, OH, MERCER COUNTY, OH and DEPUTY SHERIFF CHAD FORTKAMP, Mercer County, OH
Justin Yool Oh v. Dept of Justice
as 2:2024cv02431
Petitioner:
Justin Yool Oh
Respondent:
Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oh v. Dexian et al
as 1:2024cv00431
Plaintiff:
Thomas Oh
Defendant:
Dexian and CACI International Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Oh v. Dexian et al
as 1:2024cv00428
Plaintiff:
Thomas Oh
Defendant:
Dexian and CACI International Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Wrongful Termination of Employment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
