Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Curtiss v. State of Florida et al
as 6:2020cv01609
Plaintiff:
Westley Curtiss
Defendant:
Unknown John and Jane Does, Paul S. West, Kyle Fletcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DC v. State of Florida et al
as 6:2017cv00532
Plaintiff:
DC
Defendant:
State of Florida, The Florida Department of Children and Families, The Florida Department of Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Uzoamaka Ogbozor et al v. Macy's West Stores Inc et al
as 2:2017cv01863
Defendant:
Coty, Inc., Does and Macy's West Stores Inc
Plaintiff:
I.O.
Petitioner:
Ozoamaka Ogbozor
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv01227
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Robinson et al v. Porter et al
as 2:2016cv00247
Plaintiff:
Dan Robinson , Jill Robinson , Andrew Adamson and others
Defendant:
Stacey Porter, Porter Building Systems, Robert S. West Enterprises and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
West v. Lindquist et al
as 3:2015cv05533
Defendant:
Mark Lindquist and Pierce County
Plaintiff:
Arthur S West
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Vargo v. City of Cleveland, Tennessee et al
as 1:2012cv00248
Plaintiff:
James Samuel Vargo
Defendant:
City of Cleveland, Tennessee , Cleveland Police Department , M.C. Union Restaurants, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santoro v. Macy's West Stores, Inc.
as 2:2012cv01048
Defendant:
Macy's West Stores, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Samantha Santoro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Dianne Barker v. City of Phoenix, et al
as 12-15228
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DIANNE BARKER
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHOENIX, named as: City of Phoenix Municipal Corporation, PHILIP GORDON, Mayor, 21ST CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY, named as: 21st Century Ins. of S West and others
West v. Port of Tacoma et al
as 3:2011cv05205
Plaintiff:
Arthur S West
Defendant:
Port of Tacoma, State of Washington, Port of Olympia and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
