Cases 11 - 20 of 66
Sanders v. Harris et al (MAG +)
as 2:2022cv00280
Plaintiff:
Jarmal Jabbar Sanders
Defendant:
Daniel Harris, Jr., Ronda M. Walker, Isaiah Sankey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
O'Rourke, et al v. Dominion Voting Systems, et al
as 21-1442
Plaintiff:
KEVIN O'ROURKE, NATHANIEL L. CARTER, LORI CUTUNILLI and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation, FACEBOOK, INC., a Delaware corporation, CENTER FOR TECH AND CIVIC LIFE and others
Defendant:
MARK E. ZUCKERBERG, individually, PRISCILLA CHAN, individually, BRIAN KEMP, individually and others
Appellant:
GARY D. FIELDER and ERNEST J. WALKER
Bowman et al v. Chambers et al
as 4:2021cv01406
Plaintiff:
John Bowman, Karen Cloyd, Glenn Koenen and others
Defendant:
Robert L. Chambers, Patricia Yaeger, Marsha E. Haeffner and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Becky Arps, Rene Artman, Adam Bohn and others
Petitioner:
Dr. Sam Page and Cora Faith Walker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
O'Rourke, et al v. Dominion Voting Systems, et al
as 21-1394
Plaintiff:
KEVIN O'ROURKE, NATHANIEL L. CARTER, LORI CUTUNILLI and others
Defendant / Appellee:
DOMINION VOTING SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation, FACEBOOK, INC., a Delaware corporation, CENTER FOR TECH AND CIVIC LIFE and others
Defendant:
MARK E. ZUCKERBERG, individually, PRISCILLA CHAN, individually, BRIAN KEMP, individually and others
Appellant:
GARY D. FIELDER and ERNEST J. WALKER
FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES AND YOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP et al v. Lee et al
as 9:2021cv81823
Plaintiff:
FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES AND YOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP, DISABILITY RIGHTS FLORIDA and COMMON CAUSE
Defendant:
Laurel M. Lee, Kim A Barton, Christopher Milton and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Republican National Committee and NATIONAL REPUBLICATION SENATORIAL COMMITTEE
FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES ANDYOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP et al v. Lee et al
as 9:2021mc81824
Plaintiff:
FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES ANDYOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP, DISABILITY RIGHTS FLORIDA, COMMON CAUSE and others
Defendant:
Laurel M. Lee, Kim A Barton, Christopher Milton and others
Intervenor Defendant:
REPUBLICAN NATIONALCOMMITTEE and NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE
3Rd Party Defendant:
The Heritage Foundation and Heritage Action for America
FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES ANDYOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP et al v. Lee et al
as 9:2021cv81824
Plaintiff:
FLORIDA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES ANDYOUTH UNITS OF THE NAACP, DISABILITY RIGHTS FLORIDA, COMMON CAUSE and others
Defendant:
Laurel M. Lee, Kim A Barton, Christopher Milton and others
Intervenor Defendant:
REPUBLICAN NATIONALCOMMITTEE and NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE
3Rd Party Defendant:
The Heritage Foundation and Heritage Action for America
HARRIET TUBMAN FREEDOM FIGHTERS CORP et al v. LEE et al
as 4:2021cv00242
Plaintiff:
Head Count, Inc., HeadCount, Harriet Tubman Freedom Fighters, Corp. and others
Defendant:
ASHLEY MOODY, LAUREL LEE, KAITI LENHART and others
Intervenor Defendant:
REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE and NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FLORIDA RISING TOGETHER et al v. LEE et al
as 4:2021cv00201
Defendant:
LAUREL M LEE, CRAIG LATIMER, PENNY OGG and others
Plaintiff:
UNIDOSUS, Poder Latinx, HISPANIC FEDERATION and others
Intervenor Defendant:
REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE and NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE
Amicus Curiae:
District of Columbia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF FLORIDA INC et al v. LEE et al
as 4:2021cv00186
Defendant:
ASHLEY MOODY, JULIE MARCUS, MELISSA ARNOLD and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT BRIGHAM, BLACK VOTERS MATTER FUND, INC., CECILE SCOON and others
Intervenor Defendant:
REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE and NATIONAL REPUBLICAN SENATORIAL COMMITTEE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
