Cases 21 - 30 of 57
OCA-Greater Houston, et al v. State of Texas, et al
as 16-51126
Plaintiff - Appellee:
OCA-GREATER HOUSTON and MALLIKA DAS
Defendant - Appellant:
STATE OF TEXAS and CARLOS CASCOS, In his official capacity as Texas Secretary of State and Chief Election Officer
Faas v. Cascos et al
as 4:2016cv01299
Plaintiff:
Souraya Faas
Defendant:
Carlos Cascos and State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
US v. State of North Carolina
as 16-1529
Plaintiff / Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS and KIM WESTBROOK STRACH
Intervenor Defendant:
CHRISTINA KELLEY GALLEGOS-MERRILL and JUDICIAL WATCH, INCORPORATED
Amicus Curiae:
CONSTITUTIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY CENTER, STACEY STITT, MARIA DIAZ and others
League of Women Voters of Nort v. State of North Carolina
as 16-1474
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, MAJA KRICKER, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, JOSHUA D. MALCOLM, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, STATE OF GEORGIA, LINDSEY GRAHAM and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
ASGOD BARRANTES, BRIAN M. MILLER, EBONY N. WEST and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SARA STOHLER, KAY BRANDON, UNIFOUR ONESTOP COLLABORATIVE and others
N.C. State Conference v. Patrick McCrory
as 16-1468
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF TEXAS, LINDSEY GRAHAM, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ARMENTA EATON, BETHEL A. BAPTIST CHURCH, EMMANUEL BAPTIST CHURCH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
MAJA KRICKER, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, JOSHUA D. MALCOLM, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, PAUL J. FOLEY, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections and others
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE 3, NEW OXLEY HILL BAPTIST CHURCH, JOHN DOE 3 and others
League of Women Voters of Nort v. State of North Carolina
as 16-1469
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, MAJA KRICKER, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, JOSHUA D. MALCOLM, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF MICHIGAN, STATE OF GEORGIA, LINDSEY GRAHAM and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
ASGOD BARRANTES, CHARLES M. GRAY and MARY-WREN RITCHIE
Not Yet Classified:
BECKY HURLEY MOCK, LOUIS M. DUKE, BRIAN M. MILLER and others
Plaintiff:
LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NORTH CAROLINA, OCTAVIA RAINEY, NORTH CAROLINA A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE and others
OCA-Greater Houston et al v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2015cv00679
Defendant:
Carlos Cascos, City of Round Rock, State of Texas and others
Plaintiff:
Mallika Das and OCA-Greater Houston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1973 Voting Rights Act
Marc Veasey, et al v. Rick Perry, et al
as 14-41127
Plaintiff - Appellee:
MARC VEASEY, JANE HAMILTON, SERGIO DELEON and others
Intervenor Plaintiff - Appellee:
IMANI CLARK, TEXAS LEAGUE OF YOUNG VOTERS EDUCATION FUND, TEXAS ASSOCIATION OF HISPANIC COUNTY JUDGES AND COUNTY COMMISSIONERS and others
Movant - Appellee:
BIPARTISAN LEGAL ADVISORY GROUP OF THE U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, KIRK P. WATSON, RODNEY ELLIS and others
Defendant - Appellant:
RICK PERRY, in his Official Capacity as Governor of Texas, NANDITA BERRY, in her Official Capacity as Texas Secretary of State, STATE OF TEXAS and others
State of Texas v. USA, et al
as 14-5151
Plaintiff - Appellant:
State of Texas
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America and Eric H. Holder, Jr., in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States
Intervenor For Defendant - Appellee:
Wendy Davis, Senator, John Jenkins, Vicki Bargas and others
Ortiz v. State Of Texas
as 2:2013cv00348
Plaintiff:
Belinda Ortiz , Lenard Taylor , Eulalio Mendez, Jr. and others
Defendant:
State Of Texas, John Steen and Steve McCraw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
