Voting Cases
Louis M. Duke v. State of North Carolina
as 16-2193
Plaintiff: NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES OF THE NAACP, ROSANELL EATON, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Intervenor/Plaintiff: CHARLES M. GRAY, ASGOD BARRANTES and MARY-WREN RITCHIE
Intervenor/Plaintiff - Appellant: LOUIS M. DUKE, JOSUE E. BERDUO, BRIAN M. MILLER and others
Defendant - Appellee: PATRICK L. MCCRORY, in his official capacity as Governor of the state of North Carolina, KIM WESTBROOK STRACH, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, JOSHUA B. HOWARD, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections and others
Intervenor/Defendant: CHRISTINA KELLEY GALLEGOS-MERRILL and JUDICIAL WATCH, INCORPORATED
NC State Conference v. Patrick McCrory We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-1468
Plaintiff - Appellant: NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES OF THE NAACP, ROSANELL EATON, EMMANUEL BAPTIST CHURCH and others
Plaintiff: JOHN DOE 1, JANE DOE 1, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Defendant - Appellee: PATRICK L. MCCRORY, in his official capacity as Governor of the state of North Carolina, KIM WESTBROOK STRACH, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, JOSHUA B. HOWARD, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections and others
N.C. State Conference v. Patrick McCrory
as 16-1468
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF TEXAS, LINDSEY GRAHAM, STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ARMENTA EATON, BETHEL A. BAPTIST CHURCH, EMMANUEL BAPTIST CHURCH and others
Defendant / Appellee: MAJA KRICKER, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, JOSHUA D. MALCOLM, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, PAUL J. FOLEY, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections and others
Plaintiff: JANE DOE 3, NEW OXLEY HILL BAPTIST CHURCH, JOHN DOE 3 and others
NC State Conference v. Patrick McCrory
as 14-1856
Plaintiff - Appellant: NORTH CAROLINA STATE CONFERENCE OF BRANCHES OF THE NAACP, ROSANELL EATON, EMMANUEL BAPTIST CHURCH and others
Plaintiff: NEW OXLEY HILL BAPTIST CHURCH, BAHEEYAH MADANY, JOHN DOE and others
Defendant - Appellee: PATRICK L. MCCRORY, in his official capacity as Governor of the state of North Carolina, JOSHUA B. HOWARD, in his official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections, RHONDA K. AMOROSO, in her official capacity as a member of the State Board of Elections and others
: , , and others
Keith Judd, et al v. Barack Obama, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-57177
Plaintiff - Appellant: KEITH JUDD, ORLY TAITZ, THOMAS G. MACLERAN and others
Defendant - Appellee: BARACK OBAMA, in his capacity as a candidate on the ballot for the US President in 2012 election, NATALIE E. TENNANT, in her capacity of West Virginia Secretary of State, DEBRA BOWEN, in her capacity of California Secretary of State and others
Keith Judd et al v. Barack Obama et al
as 8:2012cv01888
Defendant: Michael Astrue, John Avlon, Ballot Law Commission of State of New Hampshire and others
Plaintiff: David Farrar, Keith Judd, Leah Lax and others
Keith Judd et al v. Barack Obama et al
as 8:2012cv01507
Defendant: Michael Astrue, John Avlon, Ballot Law Commission of State of Hew Hampshire and others
Plaintiff: David Farrar, Keith Judd, Leah Lax and others
Libertarian Party of ND, et al v. Alvin Jaeger We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-3212
Plaintiff - Appellant: Libertarian Party of North Dakota, Richard Ames, Thommy Passa and others
Defendant - Appellee: Alvin Jaeger
Type: Civil Rights Voting
Libertarian Party of North Dakota et al v. Jaeger
as 3:2010cv00064
Plaintiff: Libertarian Party of North Dakota, Richard Ames, Thommy Passa and others
Defendant: Alvin A. Jaeger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Type: Civil Rights Voting

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?