Cases 31 - 40 of 48
In Re UnitedHealth Group PBM Litigation
as 0:2016cv03352
Plaintiff:
Anna Mohr , Samantha Sohmer , Charles Wiltsie and others
Defendant:
UnitedHealthcare, Inc. , United HealthCare Services, Inc. , UnitedHealthCare Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Anghel v. Commissioner of New York State Department of Education et al
as 2:2016cv03773
Plaintiff:
M.D. Maria-Lucia Anghel
Defendant:
Alexander G. Bateman, Claudia Morales Bloch, Claudia Morales Block and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Anghel v. Commissioner of New York State Department of Education et al
as 1:2016cv04379
Plaintiff:
Maria Lucia Anghel
Defendant:
Commissioner of New York State Department of Education, Maryellen Elia, The New York State Department of Health and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Prime Healthcare Services, Inc. v. Service Employees International Union et al
as 3:2014cv02553
Respondent:
Service Employees International Union , Mary Kay Henry , Change to Win and others
Petitioner:
Prime Healthcare Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Prime Healthcare Services, Inc. v. Service Employees International Union et al
as 3:2014cv03831
Defendant:
Service Employees International Union , Mary Kay Henry , Change to Win and others
Plaintiff:
Prime Healthcare Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Oxford Health Insurance, Inc. et al v. Hamner et al
as 1:2013cv00375
Plaintiff:
Oxford Health Insurance, Inc. , Oxford Health Plans (N.Y.), Inc. , United Healthcare Insurance Company of New York, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Daniel Hamner , Daniel Hamner Physician, P.C. , Daniel Hamner, M.D., P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Connecticut General Life Ins., et al v. New Images of Beverly Hills, et al
as 12-57066
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CONNECTICUT GENERAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, EQUITABLE LIFE ASSURANCE SOCIETY OF THE UNITED STATES, CIGNA EMPLOYEE BENEFITS SERVICES INC. and others
Defendant:
NEW IMAGES OF BEVERLY HILLS, DBA Beverly Hills Outpatient Surgery Center, SUSAN ALTER, PROVIDENCE AMBULATORY SURGERY CENTER, INC., DBA Providence Ambulatory Surgery Center and others
Defendant - Appellant:
HERBERT HUDSON
CARE ONE MANAGEMENT, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv06371
Plaintiff:
CARE ONE MANAGEMENT, LLC , CARE ONE AT BIRCHWOOD, LLC , CARE ONE AT EAST BRUNSWICK, LLC and others
Defendant:
UNITED HEALTHCARE WORKERS EAST, SEIU 1199 and NEW ENGLAND HEALTH CARE EMPLOYEES UNION, DISTRICT 1199
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
New England Carpenters Health, et al v. First DataBank, Inc., et al
as 09-2381
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NEW ENGLAND CARPENTERS HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, PIRELLI ARMSTRONG RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST, TEAMSTERS HEALTH & WELFARE FUND OF PHILADELPHIA AND VICINITY and others
Interested Party - Appellant:
NATIONAL AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER INDUSTRY WELFARE FUND
Defendant - Appellee:
MCKESSON CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation
Defendant:
FIRST DATABANK, INC., a Missouri Corporation
Interested Party:
AMERISOURCEBERGEN, BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MICHIGAN, DEVILLE PHARMACIES, INC. and others
Amicus Curiae:
PHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, INDEPENDENT PHARMACY COOPERATIVE and NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHAIN DRUG STORES, INC.
New England Carpenters Health, et al v. First DataBank, Inc., et al
as 09-2380
Plaintiff - Appellee:
NEW ENGLAND CARPENTERS HEALTH BENEFITS FUND, PIRELLI ARMSTRONG RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST, PHILADELPHIA FEDERATION OF TEACHERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND and others
Interested Party - Appellant:
HEALTH MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATES, INC.
Petitioner - Appellee:
JUNE SWAN
Defendant - Appellee:
MCKESSON CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation
Defendant:
FIRST DATABANK, INC., a Missouri Corporation
Interested Party:
AMERISOURCEBERGEN, BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MICHIGAN, DEVILLE PHARMACIES, INC. and others
Amicus Curiae:
PHARMACEUTICAL CARE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, INDEPENDENT PHARMACY COOPERATIVE and NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHAIN DRUG STORES, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
