Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Cases
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO. et al v. NATALE et al
as 1:2023cv02338
Plaintiff: GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES INSURANCE CO., GEICO INDEMNITY CO., GEICO GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cross Claimant: MICHAEL NATALE, PH.D. and MICHAEL NATALE, PH.D., LLC
Cross Defendant: ADAM J. BENN, D.C., ATLAS CHIROPRACTIC, LLC, ABHIJEET RASTOGI, M.D. and others
Defendant: HAMILTON PAIN AND REHAB ASSOCIATES, LLC and STEVE ALBERTI, D.C.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
ZOU et al v. MARKET AMERICA, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00954
Defendant: DOLLY KUO, MARKET AMERICA WORLDWIDE INC., LIU LUCY HONG and others
Plaintiff: OLLIE LAN, JINHUA ZOU, CHUANJIE YANG and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Zou et al v. Market America, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv01282
Defendant: Dolly Kuo, Liu Lucy Hong, Marty Weissman and others
Plaintiff: Ollie Lan, Jinhua Zou, Chuanjie Yang and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
BEG INVESTMENTS, LLC v. ALBERTI, ET AL. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00182
Plaintiff: BEG INVESTMENTS, LLC
Defendant: NICHOLAS SALVATORE ALBERTI, DONALD CORTES BROOKS, HERMAN ODELL JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2007cv60760
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
United States ex rel, et al v. Accent Builders, Inc, et al
as 2:2000cv10255
Plaintiff: Bruce Darian Individually, on his own behalf also known as Seal 1 doing business as Darian Construction Co, U S Government as relator on behalf of the United States Government also known as Seal 2 doing business as Darian Construction Co and Seal
Defendant: Accent Builders Inc, Anthony Lawrence Federico, Ronald Ray Federico and others
Petitioner: Harold Bookout
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?