Cases 11 - 20 of 261
Courboin v. Passaic County New Jersey Superior Court et al
as 2:2022cv05332
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Courboin, Jr.
Defendant:
Passaic County New Jersey Superior Court, Earnest M. Caposela and Heather C. Hausleben
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Courboin v. Passaic County New Jersey Superior Court et al
as 8:2022cv01637
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Courboin, Jr.
Defendant:
Passaic County New Jersey Superior Court, Earnest M. Caposela and Heather C. Hausleben
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
STARKS v. WHITE et al
as 3:2022cv00058
Petitioner:
JOSEPH DONNELL STARKS
Respondent:
D PARKS WHITE, HARVEY WASSERMAN, EARNEST MONTGOMERY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cummings v. Carlton
as 2:2022cv14184
Plaintiff:
Earnest Cummings
Defendant:
Warden Carlton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sanchez v. Unknown
as 5:2022cv02801
Petitioner:
Vincent Earnest Sanchez
Respondent:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Earnest Woods, II v. Ron Broomfield
as 22-15695
Petitioner / Appellant:
EARNEST CASSELL WOODS II
Respondent / Appellee:
RON BROOMFIELD
Jarred Tyler Earnest v. San Bernardino County
as 5:2022cv00655
Petitioner:
Jarred Tyler Earnest
Respondent:
San Bernardino County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Broomfield
as 4:2022cv02312
Plaintiff:
Earnest C. Woods
Defendant:
Ron Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jones, II v. Salamon et al
as 1:2022cv00096
Petitioner:
Earnest Lee Jones, II
Respondent:
Bobbi Jo Salamon and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Dozier
as 4:2021cv03733
Petitioner:
Earnest K. Johnson
Respondent:
Kelly Dozier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
