Cases 11 - 20 of 1,462
WOOD v. STATE OF FLORIDA
as 4:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
CHARITY NOELLE WOOD
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Kendrick v. Warden, Marion County Jail
as 5:2024cv00157
Petitioner:
Reavis Levon Kendrick
Defendant:
Billy Woods and Warden, Marion County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Evans v. Grady County Jail et al
as 5:2024cv00321
Petitioner:
Raymond C Evans
Defendant:
FNU Walker
Respondent:
Grady County Jail, Jim Gorlach, FNU Cade and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Woods v. Wiza
as 1:2024cv01249
Petitioner:
Fabian Woods, Jr.
Respondent:
Scott Wiza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WOODS v. REAGEL
as 1:2024cv00511
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER WOODS
Respondent:
REAGEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carl Woods v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10822
Petitioner:
CARL EZEKIEL WOODS
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Logsdon v. Woods
as 5:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
Richard Logsdon
Respondent:
Billie Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Christopher Woods v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10617
Petitioner:
CHRISTOPHER WOODS
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Bright v. Wood
as 3:2024cv00173
Petitioner:
Rickey Bright
Respondent:
Chris Wood, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Wiza et al
as 1:2024cv00575
Petitioner:
Fabian Woods, Jr.
Respondent:
Scott Wiza and Rutledge State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
