Cases 21 - 30 of 50
Gable v. Hansen
as 6:2020cv00052
Petitioner:
Michelle Coller Gable
Respondent:
Jennie Hansen and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
CULLUM v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
as 3:2019cv14549
Petitioner:
JENNIE CULLUM
Defendant:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Coles v. Wind River Detention Center Acting Warden et al
as 1:2018cv00109
Plaintiff:
Tijay Coles
Defendant:
Jennie Ferris, Acting Warden, Terri Smith Chief Judge Wind River Tribal Court Shoshone and Arapaho Tribes in Wyoming, Wind River Indian Reservation, Wind River Detention Center Acting Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
McCown v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2018cv00415
Petitioner:
Jennie L. McCown
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McCown v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2017cv00596
Petitioner:
Jennie L. McCown
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McCown v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2018cv00052
Petitioner:
Jennie L. McCown
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Rivera
as 1:2015cv09729
Petitioner:
Lawrence Johnson
Respondent:
Jenny Rivera
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Eisenman v. Stephens
as 4:2014cv02890
Respondent:
William Stephens
Petitioner:
Jenny H Eisenman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Craig Thompson v. Jewel Steele
as 13-5137
Petitioner - Appellant:
CRAIG LAMONT THOMPSON
Respondent - Appellee:
JENNIE JOBE and JEWEL STEELE
Maxwell v. Gau
as 0:2012cv01770
Petitioner:
Larry D Maxwell
Respondent:
Collin Gau and Linda K Jenny
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
