Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Gonzalez v. Houston
as 4:2013cv03016
Petitioner:
Joes E. Gonzalez
Respondent:
Robert P. Houston
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ellis v. Houston et al
as 4:2012cv03206
Respondent:
Fred Britten, Jon Burning and Robert P. Houston
Petitioner:
Glenn E. Ellis
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Freeman v. Houston et al
as 8:2012cv00262
Respondent:
Fred Britten and Robert P. Houston
Petitioner:
Thomas E. Freeman
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sherrod v. Pearl et al
as 4:2012cv03121
Respondent:
LCC and Mario Pearl
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Petitioner:
James E. Sherrod
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis v. State of Neb
as 4:2010cv03152
Petitioner:
Harry E. Davis
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Respondent:
State of Neb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wiig v. Ives
as 8:2010cv00233
Respondent:
Mr. Ives
Petitioner:
Charles E. Wiig
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Burdette v. Britten
as 8:2008cv00536
Petitioner:
David E. Burdette
Respondent:
Fred Britten
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Patterson v. Houston
as 8:2008cv00456
Petitioner:
Henry E. Patterson, Jr.
Respondent:
Robert Houston
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lopez v. Nebraska, State of
as 8:2008cv00443
Petitioner:
James E. Lopez
Respondent:
Nebraska, State of
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lopez v. Houston et al
as 4:2008cv03091
Petitioner:
Norma E. Lopez
Respondent:
Robert Houston and State of Nebraska
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
