Cases 21 - 30 of 138
Lee v. Bonner et al
as 2:2022cv01583
Plaintiff:
Wendolyn Lee
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner and Tennessee State
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Edwards v. Bonner
as 2:2022cv02291
Petitioner:
Terry Edwards and Torry Edwards
Respondent:
Floyd Bonner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lee v. Bonner et al
as 2:2022cv02287
Petitioner:
Wendolyn Lee
Respondent:
Floyd Bonner, Chris Craft and Amy Weirich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Whitcher v. Stein et al
as 5:2022hc02084
Petitioner:
Aulden Mathew Whitcher
Respondent:
Josh Stein, Jon David, John Ingram and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lee v. Bonner et al
as 2:2022cv01049
Plaintiff:
Wendolyn Lee
Defendant:
Floyd Bonner, Chris Craft and Amy Weirich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonner v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00265
Petitioner:
Andre Romon Bonner and Andre Bonner
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only) and PLAINFIELD E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Bonner
as 2:2022cv02113
Petitioner:
Kiara Jones
Respondent:
Floyd Bonner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Bonner v. Stanley
as 5:2021hc02159
Petitioner:
Jan Maurice Bonner
Respondent:
Drew Stanley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Patton v. Campbell et al
as 2:2021cv02312
Respondent:
District Attorney General of the 30th Judicial District of Tennessee, J.W. Campbell and Floyd Bonner
Petitioner:
Vernon Charles Patton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jackson v. Bonner
as 2:2021cv02061
Respondent:
Floyd Bonner, Jr.
Petitioner:
Terrell Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
