Cases 31 - 40 of 2,191
Berry v. Shinn et al
as 3:2019cv08274
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Charles L Ryan and David Shinn
Petitioner:
Edwin Taylor Berry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cafaro v. Shinn et al
as 4:2019cv00463
Petitioner:
Steven Edward Cafaro
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Charles L Ryan and David Shinn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Evans #315961 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2019cv05159
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Charles L Ryan and David Shinn
Petitioner:
Shavez Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Harris #113830 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2019cv05147
Petitioner:
Jason Lee Harris
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Charles L Ryan and David Shinn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Micael v. Ryan et al
as 2:2019cv05082
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan
Petitioner:
Mulugeta Yemane Micael
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brakhop v. Ryan et al
as 2:2019cv05078
Petitioner:
Dale Brakhop
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and David Shinn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ibarra v. Shinn et al
as 4:2019cv00447
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan, Arizona Attorney General and David Shinn
Petitioner:
Eric Ibarra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wise v. Ryan et al
as 2:2019cv05076
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Charles L Ryan
Petitioner:
Danny Wise
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mutuberria v. Ryan et al
as 2:2019cv05057
Petitioner:
Michael Mutuberria
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and David Shinn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Garza #105785 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2019cv05480
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Arizona, Charles L Ryan and David Shinn
Petitioner:
David Sanchez Garza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
