Cases 31 - 40 of 1,081
Curry v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2022cv00097
Petitioner:
Donny Joe Curry
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Curry v. Nash
as 22-60360
Petitioner / Appellant:
Hakeem Curry
Respondent / Appellee:
Cheron Nash, Warden, Federal Correctional Institute Yazoo City Medium
Ronald Curry v. David Gray
as 22-3546
Petitioner / Appellant:
RONALD CURRY
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID W. GRAY, Warden
Curry v. Hasty et al
as 7:2022cv00733
Petitioner:
Donell Curry
Respondent:
Denise Hasty and Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Curry v. USA
as 3:2022cv00180
Petitioner:
Jeriton Lavar Curry
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plummer v. Curry County Adult Detention Center et al
as 2:2022cv00286
Petitioner:
Chance G. Plummer
Respondent:
Curry County Adult Detention Center and Hector Balderas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Currie v. Officer Blake Slater et al
as 1:2022cv00152
Petitioner:
Cyrus Currie
Respondent:
Officer Blake Slater, Boise Police Department and Daniel Dinger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oliphant v. Curry et al
as 3:2022cv00201
Petitioner:
Rashard S. Oliphant
Respondent:
Lenny Curry, Mike Williams and Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Becerra v. Curry
as 1:2022cv00580
Petitioner:
Cesar Becerra
Respondent:
Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oliphant v. Williams et al
as 3:2022cv00054
Petitioner:
Rashard S. Oliphant
Respondent:
Mike Williams and Lenny Curry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
