Cases 31 - 40 of 68
Richard Welk v. Matthew Cate
as 13-56424
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD JAMES WELK
Respondent - Appellee:
MATTHEW L. CATE
Richard Ashton v. William Stephens, Director
as 13-10475
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD JAMES ASHTON
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Richard Johnson v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 13-10130
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD JAMES JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Johnson v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2012cv00268
Petitioner:
Richard James Johnson
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Welk v. Cate
as 3:2012cv02943
Petitioner:
Richard James Welk
Respondent:
Matthew Cate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 2:2012cv00215
Petitioner:
Richard James Johnson
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ashton v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2012cv00527
Petitioner:
Richard James Ashton
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martinez v. Roggenbuck
as 2:2012cv11778
Petitioner:
richard james martinez
Respondent:
joan roggenbuck
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Court of Criminal Appeals
as 9:2011cv00171
Petitioner:
Richard James Johnson
Respondent:
Court of Criminal Appeals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Court of Criminal Appeals
as 1:2011cv00825
Respondent:
Court of Criminal Appeals
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Richard James Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
