Cases 41 - 50 of 568
Sanchez v. Garrido
as 4:2022cv00902
Petitioner:
Fernando Sanchez
Defendant:
Warden F.J. Garrdio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Martinez v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00845
Petitioner:
Fernando Martinez and Fernando R Martinez
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Mancillas Medina v. Brewer
as 2:2022cv01735
Petitioner:
Luis Fernando Mancillas Medina
Respondent:
David Brewer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Luis Arango v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 22-13221
Petitioner / Appellant:
LUIS FERNANDO ISAZA ARANGO
Respondent / Appellee:
FCC COLEMAN - LOW WARDEN
Cuajivoy-Cortes v. Stone
as 3:2022cv00105
Petitioner:
Favio Fernando Cuajivoy-Cortes
Respondent:
Warden Stacey N. Stone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Arango v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2022cv00360
Petitioner:
Luis Fernando Isaza Arango
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Isaza Arango v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2022cv00343
Petitioner:
Luis Fernando Isaza Arango
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
(HC) Jimenez v. Rex
as 1:2022cv00758
Petitioner:
Luis Fernando Jimenez
Respondent:
J Rex
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Sanchez v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2022fp00231
Petitioner:
Fernando Sanchez
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Fernando Robles v. Attorney General for the State of Nevada, et al
as 22-15591
Petitioner / Appellant:
FERNANDO ROBLES
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA and TIM GARRETT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
