Cases 41 - 50 of 373
Ruiz-Gayton v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00074
Plaintiff:
Erasmo Ruiz-Gayton
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ruiz-Gayton v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv00255
Plaintiff:
Erasmo Ruiz-Gayton
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Arturo S Ruiz v. Bryan Birkholz
as 2:2023cv00926
Petitioner:
Arturo S. Ruiz
Respondent:
Bryan Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ruiz-Romero v. Department of Justice
as 3:2023cv01044
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Ruiz-Romero
Defendant:
Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruiz, Jesus v. Keyes, R.D.
as 3:2023cv00037
Petitioner:
Jesus Ruiz
Respondent:
R.D. Keyes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ruiz v. Warden, FCC Coleman Low
as 5:2022cv00640
Petitioner:
Carlos Alberto Caicedo Ruiz
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Colon Ruiz v. Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
as 5:2022cv00594
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Colon Ruiz
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman-Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Raul Ruiz, Jr. v. Marcy Stroud
as 22-3229
Petitioner / Appellant:
Raul Velasquez Ruiz, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
Marcy Stroud
Ruiz v. Covello et al
as 3:2022cv05777
Petitioner:
Benjamin Ramirez Ruiz
Respondent:
Warden Patrick Covello and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruiz-Solano v. Russell
as 2:2022cv02303
Petitioner:
Santos Elena Ruiz-Solano
Respondent:
Eileen Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
