Cases 51 - 60 of 96
Millan-Camacho v. Ryan et al
as 3:2015cv08031
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Millan-Camacho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Camacho v. Lizarraga
as 3:2015cv00764
Petitioner:
Pablo Camacho
Respondent:
Joe A. Lizarraga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Israel Mata-Camacho v. Jeffrey Van Winkle, et al
as 14-16657
Petitioner - Appellant:
ISRAEL MATA-CAMACHO
Respondent - Appellee:
JEFFREY VAN WINKLE and ATTRONEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Salazar v. United States of America
as 1:2014cv00344
Petitioner:
Jose Camacho Salazar
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jose Camacho Salazar v. United States of America
as 2:2014cv01202
Petitioner:
Jose Camacho Salazar
Respondent:
United States of America
Manuel Camacho v. Ray Hobbs
as 13-3584
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Manuel Enrique Camacho
Defendant - Appellee:
Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Mata-Camacho v. Van Winkle et al
as 2:2013cv00961
Petitioner:
Israel Mata-Camacho
Respondent:
Jeffrey Van Winkle and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Camacho v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2013cv01172
Petitioner:
Alejandro Rio Camacho
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Laura Camacho v. State of Nevada, et al
as 13-15456
Petitioner - Appellant:
LAURA BADILLO CAMACHO
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Juilo Camacho v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 13-20046
Petitioner - Appellant:
JUILO VASQUEZ CAMACHO
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
