Cases 51 - 60 of 912
Ramirez v. Dixon
as 0:2023cv61353
Plaintiff:
Raymond J. Ramirez
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramirez v. Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
as 1:2023cv00519
Petitioner:
Alberto J Ramirez
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Topachikyan v. Ramirez
as 2:2023cv04313
Petitioner:
Avag Topachikyan
Respondent:
Luis Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramirez-Rivera v. Ray
as 3:2023cv01243
Petitioner:
Rafael Ramirez-Rivera
Respondent:
Heather Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ramirez-Rivera v. Ray
as 3:2023cv00126
Petitioner:
Rafael Ramirez-Rivera
Respondent:
Heather Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
(HC) Morales-Ramirez v. Arviza
as 1:2023cv00711
Petitioner:
Leobardo Morales-Ramirez
Respondent:
M. Arviza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Ramirez v. Attorney General State of New Mexico
as 1:2023cv00381
Petitioner:
Alberto J Ramirez
Respondent:
Attorney General State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramirez v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00160
Petitioner:
Juan Ramirez
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ramirez Rodriguez v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00155
Petitioner:
Jose Miguel Ramirez Rodriguez
Respondent:
R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ramirez v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00381
Petitioner:
Nahum Ramirez
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden FMC Fort Worth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
