Cases 51 - 60 of 153
Buzaishvili v. Albence et al
as 1:2020cv04602
Petitioner:
Zurab Buzaishvili
Respondent:
Matthew T. Albence, William P. Barr and Chad F. Wolf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Spencer v. Barr et al
as 3:2020cv30084
Respondent:
Franklin County House of Correction, Kevin K. McAleenan, Department of Homeland Security and others
Petitioner:
Derrick R Spencer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Aung v. Barr, et al
as 1:2020cv00681
Respondent:
Jeffrey Searls, Chad Wolf, Thomas Feeley and others
Petitioner:
YAE HTAT AUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PRUITT-BOYETTE v. BARR
as 1:2020cv01492
Petitioner:
KEYON PRUITT-BOYETTE
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Solis-Martinez v. Rebecca Adducci, et al
as 1:2020cv01175
Defendant:
Attorney General William P. Barr, Rebecca Adducci, Acting Secretary Chad Wolf and others
Plaintiff:
Cristhian Jared Solis-Martinez
Respondent:
Chad Wolf, Matthew T. Albence, William P. Barr and others
Rangolan v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv00628
Respondent:
Jeffrey Searls, Chad Wolf, Thomas E. Feeley and others
Petitioner:
Kevin Neville Rangolan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rangolan v. Barr et al
as 6:2020cv06355
Respondent:
Jeffrey Searls, Chad Wolf, Thomas E. Feeley and others
Petitioner:
Kevin Neville Rangolan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bashiru v. Barr et al
as 3:2020cv00482
Respondent:
Chad Wolf, Robert Guardian, Damon Acoff and others
Petitioner:
Abdulfatai A Bashiru
Defendant:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Perinparasa v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv00664
Defendant:
Scott Hassell, Neilson, Matthew Whitaker and others
Plaintiff:
Thambymuththu Perinparasa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Espinoza v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv00595
Respondent:
Jeffrey Searls, Thomas Feeley and William P. Barr
Petitioner:
Remy Antonio Espinoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
