Cases 61 - 70 of 149
Rosario v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al.
as 6:2016cv02230
Petitioner:
Juan Rosario
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rosario v. Capra
as 1:2016cv07139
Respondent:
Superintendent Michael Capra
Petitioner:
Daulin Rosario
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROSARIO v. KUTA
as 3:2016cv00261
Petitioner:
JUAN DIONISIO NOBA ROSARIO
Respondent:
SEAN M. KUTA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ROSARIO v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2016cv09227
Petitioner:
ANTHONY ROSARIO
Respondent:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GARY M. LANIGAN, JOHN FALVEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rosario-Torres v. Lane et al
as 3:2016cv01891
Petitioner:
Jesus Rosario-Torres
Respondent:
Jay Lane, PA State Attorney General and Sarah Ann Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ROSARIO v. KUTA
as 3:2016cv00201
Petitioner:
REYNALDO ROSARIO
Respondent:
S. M. KUTA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rosario v. The People of The State of New York
as 1:2016cv06338
Petitioner:
Angel L. Rosario
Respondent:
The People of The State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rosario v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2016cv00209
Petitioner:
Gerardo N. Rosario
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BONES v. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ________________
as 5:2016cv00125
Petitioner:
JAVIER ROSARIO BONES
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ________________ and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF LANCASTER COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rosario v. Warden FCI Bennettsville
as 9:2016cv00033
Petitioner:
Ramon Rosario
Respondent:
Warden FCI Bennettsville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
