General Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 83
Wattleton v. Grondolsky
as 1:2010cv03472
Petitioner: David Earl Wattleton
Respondent: Jeff Grondolsky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gray v. Swarthout We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2010cv02463
Petitioner: David Earl Gray
Respondent: Gary Swarthout
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JONES v. HOLT We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv01086
Plaintiff: DAVID EARL JONES
Defendant: RONNIE HOLT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sweed v. Thaler We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2010cv00393
Petitioner: David Earl Sweed
Respondent: Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
David Kates v. Joe Keffer, Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-30539
Petitioner - Appellant: DAVID EARL KATES
Respondent - Appellee: JOE KEFFER, Warden, United States Penitentiary
Wattleton v. Sabol
as 1:2009cv01590
Petitioner: David Earl Wattleton
Respondent: Carolyn A. Sabol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Pomar v. Warden We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2009cv00054
Petitioner: David Earl Pomar
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Lyons v. Farmer et al
as 1:2009cv00115
Petitioner: David Earl Lyons
Respondent: Mike Farmer and Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Majors v. United States Of America
as 6:2009cv00092
Petitioner: David Earl Majors
Respondent: United States Of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Majors v. Tamez
as 4:2009cv00149
Petitioner: David Earl Majors
Respondent: Rebecca Tamez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?