Cases 61 - 70 of 1,022
Diaz-Texidor v. Warden-Fort Dix Correctional Institution
as 1:2022cv07481
Petitioner:
Henry Diaz-Texidor
Respondent:
Warden-Fort Dix Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Abel Diaz v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP I
as 22-14198
Petitioner / Appellant:
ABEL DIAZ
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, FCC COLEMAN - USP I
Garza v. Salazar
as 5:2022cv01313
Petitioner:
Gilbert Diaz Garza
Defendant:
Bexar County Sheriff Javier Salazar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DIAZ v. DIXON
as 3:2022cv23905
Petitioner:
ENRIQUE DIAZ
Respondent:
RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diaz Espinoza v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2022cv00593
Petitioner:
Jose Gabriel Diaz Espinoza
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
VASQUEZ-DIAZ v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2022cv04579
Petitioner:
ANGEL VASQUEZ-DIAZ
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Diaz-Martinez v. Attorney General of the State of Colorado, et al
as 22-1396
Petitioner / Appellant:
MIGUEL ANGEL DIAZ-MARTINEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO and BARRY GOODRICH, Warden, Crowley County Correctional Facility,
Socorro Diaz v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-13775
Petitioner / Appellant:
SOCORRO MARINES DIAZ
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Willie Knox, III v. Raybon Johnson
as 22-56028
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIE H. KNOX III
Respondent / Appellee:
RALPH DIAZ and RAYBON JOHNSON, Warden
(HC) Diaz-Lozano v. Trate
as 1:2022cv01403
Petitioner:
Fausto Diaz-Lozano
Respondent:
B.M. Trate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
